Âåðíóòüñÿ â ðàçäåë «Ïðåññà» 

 

 

THE MOSCOW TIMES

22.12.2005

THE YEAR IN FILM

Tom BIRCHENOUGH

 

2005 was a year in which the revival of the Russian film industry continued to gather steam.

 

It's been a year in which Russian film has moved from strength to strength. Indeed, 2005 has proved that last year's «Night Watch» – the homegrown blockbuster that broke the mold of Hollywood domination of the local film market – wasn't the exception that proved the rule, but rather the harbinger of a trend toward loyalty to local production that looks dramatic by any international standard. Wait only a few days, until the Jan. 1 release of director Timur Bekmambetov's sequel, «Day Watch» to see that trend continue. The television ads will be almost relentless.

Blockbuster of the Year: Happiest among Russian players must be Fyodor Bondarchuk, whose Afghan war drama «Company 9» was the top grosser of 2005, taking in more than $23 million to date. With excellent ensemble playing from its youthful cast and impressive visual effects, «Company 9» won extensive plaudits from critics as well as viewers (itself something of a rare combination) and proved to be a genuinely national film, in the best sense. Its producers will deservedly crack open the end-of-year champagne – not least because they risked a great deal in development, as costs jumped in shooting. A happy end indeed, at least at the box office: The film itself was a thoughtful reflection on the end of the Soviet era, and a military adventure that didn't hold back in showing the human consequences of war.

Art-House Film of the Year: The producers behind Alexander Sokurov's «The Sun» may be feeling less happy. Though the film bowed at February's Berlin International Film Festival, it came away without a prize, and the results of its Russian release were distinctly muted. True, international juries can prove fickle, and prophets are often without honor in their homelands, but even so, the outcome was more than disappointing – for «The Sun» is among Sokurov's most nuanced works to date, drawing a remarkable central performance from the actor playing Emperor Hirohito at the end of World War II, and showing that a Russian director can direct a Japanese cast with mesmerizing skill. More than impressive.

Dynamic Duo: Writer Boris Akunin and actor-director Nikita Mikhalkov. Adaptations of Akunin's detective yarns «Turkish Gambit» and «The State Counselor» were among the top-ranking films of the year. The former, though it won on the box-office front, ultimately looked less impressive than «Counselor which captured dark moments of intrigue in pre-revolutionary Moscow and featured a show-stealing performance from Mikhalkov. Better known in recent years for his semi-political dealings, Mikhalkov has lately moved back toward directing, with two separate follow-ups to his 1995 Oscar-winner «Burnt by the Sun» in production, as well as a local remake of the Henry Fonda classic «12 Angry Men in which the character under judgment will be of Chechen origin. Many hope that he will stick to the artistic spheres, in which he's undoubtedly talented, for some time to come.

Intercinema

Most Promising News: Young directors coming through strongly can only be a good sign. Alexei German Jr. followed up on his debut, «The Last Train» with the Venice-screened «Garpastum», which looked more than respectable, if not quite brilliant. His friend and contemporary Ilya Khrzhanovsky's «4» saw limited release at long last this month, after winning plenty of international critical acclaim over the 15 months since it too played on the Venice Lido. Some local viewers will like it, many may hate it – but that's more a reflection on its subject matter than on the director's skill. Look out next year for Larisa Sadilova's third feature, «Needing a Nanny Finally, it is encouraging that Andrei Zvyagintsev, director of 2003's art-house trendsetter «The Return» is busy shooting his second feature. Delivery date: so far unknown.

Saddest News: If that sounds a happy end to a good year, then spare a parting thought for Moscow's Cinema Museum, or Muzei Kino, which closed its doors at the end of November. The whys and wherefores of that result have been played out in the local press for many years, with international intervention along the way as well – but to no avail. At the risk of beating a dead horse, it should be repeated ad infinitum: It is important for a country with a rich cinema heritage, especially one that is coming back to filmic life after a decade in the doldrums, to have a venue where up-and-coming directors and the general public can become attuned to rarely seen, high-quality work. Though art-house viewing patterns may be moving to DVD formats, there's still something unique about the shared experience of sitting in a hall, watching film in the format in which it was shot. For a country spending hundreds of millions of dollars restoring the Bolshoi Theater, is the expenditure of a fraction of that sum on a new museum really that much of a challenge? Depressing for now – and cause for considerable thought, it can only be hoped, for those involved in the decision-making.

 

Âåðíóòüñÿ â ðàçäåë «Ïðåññà»